Consistently Inconsistent Part II
Maybe pointing out the liberal insanity is pointless (since no one seems to care), but it sure it fun. The inconsistencies and utter, unabashed, blatant hypocrisy is mind blowing, not to mention infuriating. Perhaps, pointing it out, putting it on record is just a way to blow off steam.
And let me tell you, the tea kettle is at full boil this week.
The Poor Socialist with Three Houses...And an Airplane
Let’s begin with the hard-up socialist Bernie Sanders. This story is a week or two old, but I don’t think we should forget it….ever.
After a campaign of non-stop railing against the evils of the “rich”, Senator Sanders somehow found enough depth in his ragged, patched socialist pockets to buy himself a third home. Sanders explained this away saying a family house had been sold and had paid for this third home. Be that as it may, one would think a man who actually cared about the plight of the underprivileged would do a bit more than offer lip service to a cause he campaigned for the presidency on.
That $600,000 Sanders just spent on himself could have gone to providing affordable housing for people, or maybe helping some of his loyal supporters pay off their student debts. Oh, what’s that now? You say it’s the government’s job to do that, not the individual? Ah, I see.
To be clear, every conservative who believes in the pursuit of happiness would not begrudge anyone owning however many houses they wanted. However, for a self-proclaimed socialist who believes in the necessity of government-mandated material equality, it is the height of hypocrisy.
Oh, and did I mention he requested the DNC pay for a private jet for him to use? Private? That’s a dirty word. Shame on you Bernie. What would Marx and Engels say?
Extremely Lame Vetting
After Trump’s speech about very extreme vetting that would be extremely extreme (did he mention it would be extreme? He calls it extreme vetting), the subject of refugees and immigrants was once again brought to the attention of the American people. We were presented with two very different takes on the matter.
While Trump’s opinion may have it’s flaws, Hillary Clinton’s take on the matter is laughable. A proposal that could cost upwards of $400 million, Clinton believes 10,000 refugees is far too few. She’s thinking a number a bit above that, like 65,000 to begin with.
The Democrats market themselves as the defenders of women while propagating the myth of a Republican “war on women”. Nothing could be further from the truth. After all we’ve seen happen in Europe (women being raped, sexually assaulted, etc.), all of it being traceable to those countries’ open border policies, and the influx of immigrants, it is only logical to say that calling for 65,000 more immigrants to America is completely anti-women.
And another thing, we can’t afford it. Not sure if anyone has noticed but the US is pushing $20 trillion in debt. So as nice as it might seem to bring in more dependents, take a minute a find out what real compassion looks like - HERE.
The Newest Olympic Game - Spot the Sexist
The main stream media is predominately liberal. It’s no secret. That’s why during the Olympics, they can’t help but bring their favorite liberal hobby horses and ride them around like 6-year-olds who have drank too much sugar in the Kool-Aid.
It was almost comical watching many in the media desperately trying to find sexism in the Olympics while praising the hijab wearing Olympian, Ibtihaj Muhammad. Granted, there are moderate Muslims who don’t take the Koran as seriously as others. However, Islam is one of the most patriarchal, male-dominated, sexist religions to ever exist. There are many instances of Muslims killing women because those women did not wear a hijab or for other un-Islamic behavior.
I don’t know about you, but murdering women for not wearing the right kind of clothing seems a bit sexist. If you’re looking for sexism in the Olympics, maybe the gal wearing a hijab would be a good place to start?
The Return of Clock Boy
Clock Boy, aka Ahmed Mohamed, needs $15 million in damages paid to him because he brought a bomb look-alike to school in a briefcase and ignored his teachers when they told him it wasn’t a good idea.
However, a kid who nibbled his pop tart into the shape of a gun needs sent home, detention or expelled.
You really can’t make this stuff up.
Follow on Twitter: @painefultruth76
Let us know what you think: painefultruth1776@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment