#EndTruckViolenceNow

-
This week, New York suffered an act of terrorism. A follower of the Islamic State, using a rented truck, murdered 8 people in cold blood and injured 11 others in New York City. Let me begin by saying that our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims and the families of those affected by this evil act of terrorism.

While the scale of this attack is far different, one can’t help but notice the difference of coverage & reaction regarding the New York City attack when compared to the Vegas attack in September. After the Vegas attack, that was the news for at least a week afterwards. However, scrolling around news sites just days after the NYC attack, there is little to no coverage to be found.
Could it be that the NYC attack doesn’t fit the narrative that many are trying to push, and therefore covering it is not an effective use of time to accomplish their goals?

#BanTheTrucks

And while the volume of coverage is vastly different, so too is the content of the coverage. After the Vegas attack, the calls for more control over the weapon used (a gun) were rampant. After the NYC attack, the calls for more control over the weapon used (a truck) were nonexistent.
The claim is that the call for gun control is to protect life (a hypocritical claim coming from many who support Planned Parenthood & abortion on demand, but that’s another story). However, if this is the case, the calls should be just as rampant and loud regardless of the weapon used.
One of the most effective gauges of the validity of an argument is whether is remains consistent when applied to different situations that contain the same elements.
After the Las Vegas attack, many were wanting to ban all kinds of things from guns to bump stocks. Yet after this week’s attack in NYC - silence. No legislation to limit truck rentals? No epic “sit-in” on the House floor to demand action? Have they stopped caring about life? Or does this attack simply not fit their narrative that guns are the problem?
It certainly makes you wonder.

Of Immigration and Rights

Whether you believe that immigration reform would’ve solved this problem (which is debatable), there’s something we need to realize - there’s a big difference between limiting the Second Amendment and limiting immigration from foreign countries.
After the attack, the calls for immigration reform actually sounded eerily similar to that of gun control advocates after a shooting - “this has been a problem for so long, why haven’t we taken action? How many more must die before we DO something? Laws need to be passed so this no longer happens!” And etc.
However, a close examination will show that these 2 arguments are fundamentally different. Gun control advocates are talking about passing laws (that have been proven to not work) to limit or remove a God-given, inalienable right that is specifically protected by the Constitution. Immigration reform advocates are talking about passing laws to stop bad people from coming into our country.

Immigration from a foreign country to the United States is not a God-given, inalienable right. It is not specifically protected by the Constitution. In the name of national security, it is completely within the jurisdiction of the United States government to pass laws to limit immigration in order to protect US citizens. Not only is it within their jurisdiction, it is their duty.

Takeaway

Consistent Argumentation

It is easy to parrot an argument. It is difficult to do your own research, examine the facts, distinguish them from opinions, and craft your own argument. It is even more difficult to critically examine that argument and insure that it remains consistent in different situations that contain the same elements. However, it is necessary. So do it.

Impugning Your Opponent

The moment we begin believing the other side, our fellow Americans, are evil or have bad intentions, is the moment unity crumbles. Gun control advocates, with some exceptions, believe that their proposals will protect people. Even though this belief is misguided, we cannot assign evil motives to our opposition just because it makes them easier to fight. Is it too much to assume the best of others until we’re proven wrong?

Do your research. Don’t hate.
Follow on Twitter: @painefultruth76

Let us know what you think: painefultruth1776@gmail.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Articles

Peace Through Strength - North Korea & Iran vs. America

-
Image
The world benefits from a strong America. 3 American prisoners were being held in North Korea. Take a minute and let that sink in. Americans were being held against their will in hard labor prison camps. Now those 3 men are free. North Korea and South Korea are seeing tensions relaxing. While just a few months ago, the world collectively worried that North Korea was about to try and obliterate something off the map with nuclear weapons, we are now seeing the very real possibility that they will sit down and consider relinquishing those nuclear weapons. America has pulled out of the ill-advised Iran Nuclear Deal . Instead of allowing them to continue developing nuclear capabilities with “supervision”, the US will now reimpose strict sanctions against a country that is a state sponsor of terrorism around the world. As much as Trump would probably like to take credit for all these advancements, many, many people have been involved and working hard to make these things ha...
Read more

Equality: Missing the Key Word

-
Image
  What The American People Need to Know Equality, Marriage and  the Supreme Court America was watching as the Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding the Obergefell vs. Hodges case on Tuesday. A case that could determine the fate of marriage in America. This may seem like a complicated subject on the surface, but I’ve broken it down into what I believe are the main three distinct areas of argument and attempted to give a simple answer to each. The three areas are: equality, the definition of marriage, and the court’s role vs. the people’s. So let’s jump into this - equality. Twitter has been abuzz with#equalityforall. But there is an inherent flaw with people’s understanding of the whole concept of equality. They are missing the key word. All men are created equal. Given certain rights by their Creator. And government’s purpose is (supposed to be) to protect those rights (see th...
Read more

Climate Change: The Death Knell for the GOP in 2016?

-
This week, the Pope visited President Obama at the White House. He gave a speech and addressed some very pressing issues facing both America and the world as a whole. In his speech he lent his support to President Obama’s regulatory program aimed at climate change. He avoiding spending much time on social issues (e.g. abortion, marriage) instead offering an endorsement of Obama’s policies on the environment. Pope Francis said, “I find it encouraging that you are proposing an initiative for reducing air pollution. Accepting the urgency, it seems clear to me also that climate change is a problem which can no longer be left to a future generation. When it comes to the care of our common home, we are living at a critical moment of history.” Yes, climate change. An issue that many are saying could end the Republican party’s hope for the presidency in 2016. A few of the candidates have received criticism for remarks on this subject at the last presidential debate...
Read more